손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
Judgment of the first instance.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Basic facts 1) On September 2014, the Plaintiff was in charge of the Belgium labp lab on the lab lab lab lab, Yongsan-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, the Defendant’s lab lab lab, but the Defendant was not in charge of the lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab 15:40 on January 30, 2015, the Defendant continued to dispute over the lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab lab la.
(2) On February 3, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2 million for the instant illegal act (No. 2015 High Court Decision 2015 High Court Decision 930), and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 5 to 8 (including additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the tort of this case.
2. Scope of liability for damages
A. According to the evidence No. 7-20 of affirmative damage 1 A, the Plaintiff is recognized to have spent KRW 1,688,637 for medical expenses incurred by the instant tort.
The Plaintiff asserted that KRW 770,00,00 paid from D in May 20, 2016, as well as KRW 770,00,00 for the instant tort, but the Plaintiff appears to have been affected by Hanwon or receiving physical therapy even prior to the instant tort, and the Plaintiff was diagnosed as having suffered injury requiring two-day medical treatment due to the instant tort at a medical institution, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 770,000 for the said KRW 770,00 after the instant tort.