However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 2, 2013, the Defendant came to know the Victim C who had been working as an intern while graduating at Seoul Hospital, and had been working as an intern. On August 12, 2013, when the Defendant had retired from the internship course and had been found to be Daejeon, the Defendant, on August 20, 2013, got the victim of Daejeon, who had been working as the Defendant, was 704, Daejeon Seo-gu Office Officetel 704, where the victim was living in the Republic of Korea.

Since then, while the breath victim gam and returned home, he thought that he had expressed that the victim worked in the hospital and she had a considerable cash in the house in which he/she was able to collect money, but again, he/she had the victim's house taken a view that he/she had stolen money.

At around 01:00 on August 13, 2013, the Defendant entered the office of the victim located in Seo-gu Daejeon District Office Dtel 704, Daejeon, Daejeon, with the victim, opened the entrance door and intruded into the house using the current pipe password that he came to know while entering the said office with the victim, and then opened the front door of the living room and opened the front door of the living room and stolen the cash amount of KRW 2 million owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the following day of the criminal sentence and the following day), such as the fact that he/she voluntarily attends the E zone; there is no history of criminal punishment heavier than that heavier than that heavier than that heavier;