When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2014. 1. 16. 01:40경 술에 취하여 강원 정선군 C 소재 D식당 앞 도로 중앙에 E 코란도 승용차의 시동을 켠 채 정차해 두고 잠을 자던 중, 교통 불편으로 신고를 받고 출동한 정선경찰서 F파출소 소속 경위 G로부터 피고인에게서 술 냄새가 나고 횡설수설하는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 F파출소로 임의동행한 다음 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았다.

그럼에도 피고인은 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하거나 오히려 숨을 들이마시는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A witness G and H’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the proper launch of a driver, reports on the status of primary driving, and investigation reports (including photographs about refusal of measurement);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, which choose the penalty for the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. According to the statement by police officers G and H at the time of the legitimacy of the measure of drinking alcohol under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant refused to take the test at the original police box, but subsequently, decided to take a drinking test at the scene. G, along with the Defendant, was waiting for a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a breath of a police box.