2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. The Defendant is a doctor who operates the C Council (hereinafter “instant hospital”) located in Cheongju-si.

B. From January 11, 2012, the Plaintiff was admitted to the instant hospital for the treatment, etc. of knee, knee, knee, and elbows. From December 2014, the Plaintiff was admitted to the instant hospital for the treatment, etc. of feassing per se.

C. On April 2, 2015, the Defendant, on the Plaintiff’s shoulder, took an injection surgery (hereinafter “the instant medical practice”) by prescribing the satisfying agents on the Plaintiff’s shoulder, and thereafter, was diagnosed as satisfying infection as a result of the Plaintiff’s visit to the instant hospital on April 6, 2015.

On April 7, 2015, and April 8, 2015, the Plaintiff received outpatients from the instant hospital on April 7, 2015, with the left shoulder spawn infection. On April 8, 2015, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the E Hospital for an anti-culatory washing, exhaustr farming, and active therapy on May 30, 2015, and was hospitalized until May 30, 2015, and received physical therapy over 82 occasions from June 3, 2015 to October 14, 2015.

In addition, the Plaintiff received outpatient treatment from July 2015 to November 2015, 201 from the instant hospital.

E. On October 22, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed at the E Hospital as having been diagnosed as having expressed his opinion on the high left-hand leashitis, prone reciting salt, and emulmatitis.

F. As a result of the court of first instance entrusted the Plaintiff with physical appraisal, the appraisal’s opinion was observed on the left-hand check-up of the MRI, which was implemented on March 24, 2016, and the left-hand check-up of the position can be improved to a certain extent through physical therapy and rehabilitation treatment, but it was presented to the view that small scarcitys, etc. may remain permanently compared to the dry side.

[Ground of recognition] The absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 11, Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the result of the commission of physical appraisal to the Director of the Daejeon Plick Hospital at the court of the first instance,