beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.05.20 2015나10234

양수금

Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The Defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties are from the network B.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 13, 2005, the Plaintiff’s claim against the deceased B (hereinafter “the deceased”) 1) Foreign Exchange Bank, LG card, Samsung Card, Hyundai Capital, and KB-backed 2 is each of the claims listed below against the deceased (hereinafter “the claim against the acquisition of the instant amount”).

(3) The Plaintiff transferred its assets to the Plaintiff pursuant to the Asset Transfer Agreement and Asset-Backed Securitization Act, and sent the notice of assignment containing the purport thereof to the Deceased. The sum of overdue interest on the remaining principal on the date of the loan extended to 1 exchange bank on June 24, 2003, 7,242,497 11,875,628 19,118,125 2 LG card No. 25 on November 25, 2002, 104, 104, 15,689,235, 18, 18, 793, 4363, 47, 486, 37, 486, 47, 486, 37, 486, 37, 486, 47, 486, 47, 200.

B. Inheritance relation of the deceased and the proceedings of this case 1) The deceased died on July 26, 2004 (the deceased’s lineal ascendant and spouse died before the deceased’s death)

(C) As the deceased’s senior heir, C, D, and E (hereinafter “C, etc.”) are the deceased’s children.

(2) On November 21, 2013, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit against the Deceased seeking the payment of the instant transfer money, and on April 3, 2014, the first instance court corrected the Defendant from the Deceased to C, etc., on May 27, 2004, after filing a report of renunciation of inheritance with this court as the court 2004Ra527. At the time of the Deceased’s death, C et al. was tried to accept it from the above court. At the time of the Deceased’s death, C et al. was the Defendant, i.e., his/her son, his/her son, and his son’s son’s son.