The defendant shall pay 2,00,000 won to the applicant for compensation by deceit.

3.2

On July 12, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months in prison due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) in Daegu District Court and its branch court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 22, 201 of the same year, and completed the enforcement of the said sentence on February 10, 2012 in Daegu Prisons, and was engaged in the te in the te accounting business with the trade name “F.”

From April 2013, the Defendant publicizedd that, from the Defendant’s office of “F”, “H apartment,” the prospective occupants of “H apartment,” newly built in G, could perform the construction of a new interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior of the apartment. On the 26th day of the same month, the Defendant stated that “The victim I who is scheduled to move into the said apartment No. 102 301, the said apartment can install a ceiling-type container at a price lower than the market price, and the construction of the apartment can be completed before the completion of the construction, such as installation of air conditioners and heavy text.”

However, in order for the Defendant to perform the system air conditioner installation work prior to the completion of the above apartment, the Defendant did not have obtained consent from the foregoing apartment construction company, a construction company of the same apartment, even though he obtained consent from the construction company of the same-dong, to install the pipes located in the ceiling for air conditioner, and at the time, the Defendant was liable for approximately KRW 200 million in relation to the progress of the system construction in the area of J Apartment-gu, Posi-gu, North-gu, Pohang-si, and Pohang-si, in the area of the three artificial complex. However, the Defendant did not have any specific property, while the Defendant did not have any financial capability to perform the system artificial condition of the above three apartment site, and the Defendant considered that the Defendant was to use the construction cost to be received from the prospective occupants in repayment of the obligation related to the construction site of the three sites, such as the above J apartment.

The defendant is a contract amount from the victim I.