beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.12.09 2015가단40293

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant educational foundation B is a person who operates a hospital, and the defendant C is a person who works as a dental doctor of the above hospital.

(hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”). (b)

In the regular inspection conducted on July 19, 2012, the Plaintiff’s medical course at the Seoul Asan Hospital (1) was diagnosed as liveration and treatment (2) around August 2008, 2010; (3) was diagnosed as liver cancer around February 2010; and (4) was conducted on March 2010; and (4) was conducted on July 19, 2012.

C. (1) On August 30, 2012, the Plaintiff’s medical course at the Defendant Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) asserted symptoms that “from the day of electric shock, the left snow has continuously frighted, heavy snow water has come, water is equal to that in the process of massing, the inside is equal to that in the face, and flaging, and flading the skin,” and Defendant C was doubtful of the Plaintiff’s symptoms at the Defendant Hospital. On the same day, the Plaintiff was indicted of the Plaintiff’s symptoms as Belgium. On the 3th day, the Defendant C confirmed that the Plaintiff’s symptoms were flaging at the Belgium, the maI test, and the blood test, etc. was conducted by the Plaintiff at the Defendant Hospital, and confirmed that the Plaintiff’s symptoms were flaging with the blag, the flag of the Plaintiff’s symptoms as of August 30, 20

9. By September 17, 2012, the Plaintiff released from the Plaintiff on September 4, 2012, pressurin (30mg), mins (1500mg), and styren (180mg). At the time of the discharge, the Defendant C prescribed that the Plaintiff was provided outpatients (120mg, 30mg, 180mg, 180m, and 14 days) by Defendant C at the Defendant Hospital on September 17, 2012. At that time, the Defendant C received outpatients (120mg, 30mg, 10mg, and 30mg, 10mg, and 30m) from the Defendant Hospital.

(d) The results of CT shooting around March 2013, 2013, which showed a warning view on the results of CT shooting around November 2012, 2012, and which does not seem obvious recurrence, but are recommended to take additional CT shooting.