Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against each of the assaults is dismissed.

1. No person who violates the Emergency Medical Service Act shall interfere with the rescue, transfer, emergency treatment or medical treatment of an emergency patient engaged in providing emergency medical services by means of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, threat or other means;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from March 11, 2018 to 02:30, at the C Hospital emergency room located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City for about 30 minutes, provided explanation to the Defendant by the victim D, the nurse, the victim E, and F, who are a doctor, and provided a desire for the victims without any justifiable reason under the influence of alcohol.

The victim who has completed medical treatment for the defendant is recommended to discharge the defendant, and he/she is able to remove the victim from his/her inner face, and he/she is able to remove the victim from his/her inner face and he/she is able to do so.

It was difficult to avoid disturbance, such as satising “the satisfy”, which means “the satisfy.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with emergency treatment or treatment for emergency patients by force of emergency patients.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each statement of F, E, D, G, and H;

1. Application of the CD 1 statute

1. Article 60 (1) 1 and Article 12 of the Emergency Medical Service Act on criminal facts;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for imposing selective sentence of imprisonment: Large number of crimes, in particular, there are records of the same kind of crimes around around 2015, and in light of the content of the instant crimes, etc., the Defendant’s liability is very unlimited, and thus, it is inevitable to sentence a sentence.

A favorable normal condition: The defendant has been able to repent of wrong facts.

It agreed with all emergency medical service workers and related persons.

The punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the above circumstances and the conditions of sentencing, such as the previous conviction, age, sex, environment, circumstances, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendant avoid disturbance, as described in paragraph 1, at the time, at the place, and as described in paragraph 1, the victim H(24 years) causing the above hospital protection.