소유권말소등기
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the whole purport of the pleadings in the statements in Gap evidence 1-1-2, Gap evidence 4-1-3, Gap evidence 7-1 and 7-2, and there is no counter-proof.
On November 6, 1963, the networkF completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale on October 28, 1963 with respect to each one-third portion of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”).
B. On June 1, 1990, the Hongcheon District Court received 7471, the Hongcheon District Court received on June 1, 1990, and completed the supplementary registration of correction of indication that revises the name of the networkF’s transfer registration of ownership (hereinafter “the supplementary registration of correction of indication”), and on June 1, 1990, the Hongcheon District Court received 7472 from Hongcheon District Court Hongcheon Registry received on February 23, 1997, and completed the supplementary registration of alteration of indication (hereinafter “the supplementary registration of alteration of indication of this case”).
C. On February 5, 200, the deceased on February 5, 200, the deceased deceased, and the plaintiffs, the spouse H and children inherited the deceased F, and the deceased on August 8, 2008, the deceased and succeeded to the deceased H.
2. The parties' assertion
A. Defendant E without any cause completed the correction of the indication of this case and the supplementary registration of modification of the indication of this case by changing the networkF to Defendant E with respect to the instant real estate without any cause. Defendant E is not the same person as the networkF and Defendant E, and the supplementary registration of modification of the indication of this case and the supplementary registration of modification of the indication of this case, which Defendant E completed, are invalid registration that is not inconsistent with the substantive relationship. Defendant E is obligated to cancel the supplementary registration of modification of the indication of this case and the supplementary registration of modification of the indication of this case, respectively.
B. The Defendant’s assertion that the instant real estate is in the name of Defendant E, Nonparty L, and M, each of whose children is Nonparty I, the deceased J, and the deceased K.