However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

피고인은 2016. 4. 16. 05:40경 부천시 원미구 B 소재 'C노래방' 내에서, “남자손님이 일어나질 않는다”는 112신고를 접수하고 출동한 부천원미경찰서 D지구대 소속 경장 E이 술에 취해 자고 있는 피고인을 깨우자, 위 E에게 욕설하며 주먹을 수회 휘두르고, 발로 위 E의 정강이를 수회 찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the 112 Report Handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement to E and F (list 4, 5);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. According to Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence, all of the sentencing factors in the instant case, including the defendant’s age, character and conduct, living environment, and circumstances after the crime, are considered as being favorable to the defendant (a person who has no criminal record of confession or suspended sentence, and the above police officers have committed the instant crime even before and after the same time), unfavorable circumstances (a person who has committed the instant crime, is pleasure of the nature of the crime by committing the instant crime).