Around October 2007, the Defendant subscribed to D, the Defendant’s wife, as the Defendant’s wife, with the insurance period from October 12, 2007 to April 30, 2054; the monthly insurance premium from October 30, 2007 to April 30, 223,00; the Defendant, the insured, and the policyholder, as the Defendant’s wife.

According to the above insurance, in accordance with the disability rate when the after-paid disability occurs due to an accident, compensation for the general disability of KRW 100,000 shall be paid, and if the total disability rate is 50% or more, compensation for the injury income amount of KRW 50,000 shall be paid.

On the other hand, around December 21, 2009, the Defendant, at the front of the bus bus stops in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Mumpan Station, had a collision with the buses crossinged in front of the bus stops in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, and caused a traffic accident where the snow is cut off and the front is cut off, thereby receiving hospital treatment.

The Defendant, along with his mother E, acted against his will to crypt some of the visual disorders caused by the foregoing traffic accident, as if both visual disorders were lost due to the aftermath of the traffic accident, and was issued with a diagnosis of the cryptive disability by using the diagnosis of the cryptive disability, and had the Defendant receive a large amount of insurance proceeds from the insurance company.

Accordingly, the Defendant, during the course of taking a therapy at the F Hospital in Seoul, from December 21, 2009 to March 12, 2010, had a treatment doctor take a 0.02 0.04 Roster 0.02 Posium, as if both of them were not able to have the eyesight, and had the treatment doctor receive a diagnosis of a permanent masium disorder not exceeding 0.02 Posium from October 15, 201, while hospitalized in the Y University Hospital in order to receive rehabilitation treatment from October 15, 2010.

However, although the defendant can see the letters or numbers in the vision chart in fact in a state where the eyesight of the right eye has been partially deteriorated, the defendant is a traffic accident.