토지인도
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this case is as follows, and the reasoning for the court’s explanation is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the entry of evidence No. 7 and the fact-finding on the port market of the court of the first instance, which lack to admit the defendant’s assertion, and the fact-finding on the port market of the court of the first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of
2. The six pages 15 to 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written in the following manner:
"3) Ultimately, the defendant's defense of the prescription period for the acquisition of possession by the defendant is without merit (as long as the defendant's defense of the prescription period for the acquisition by possession has not been accepted, it is not necessary to further examine the defendant's assertion that the plaintiff's acquisition by possession of each land in collusion with C in order to avoid the effect of the prescription period on the premise that the prescription period for the acquisition by possession of each land has expired.
(b)";
3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims of this case are accepted in its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.