beta
(영문) 대법원 1971. 12. 28. 선고 71다1008 판결

[청구에관한이의][집19(3)민,182]

Main Issues

A lawsuit of demurrer is unlawful to seek the exclusion of the executory power of the name of the debt holder itself, and seek the denial of the individual enforcement act already executed.

Summary of Judgment

Since a lawsuit of demurrer is sought to exclude the executory power of the title of debt, it is unlawful to seek the denial of individual enforcement acts already executed.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 505 of the Civil Procedure Act

Plaintiff-Appellant

Plaintiff

Defendant-Appellee

Defendant

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 70Na492 delivered on April 6, 1971, 200

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal by the plaintiff's attorney are examined.

The purport of the judgment of the court below is that the plaintiff dismissed the plaintiff's principal and interest claim in the title of this case (the executory exemplification of the judgment in the claim for check payment in Seoul Civil Procedure Act 69A7908) on the ground that the principal and interest claim in the title of this case (the executory exemplification of the judgment in claim for check payment in Seoul Civil Procedure Act 69A7908) was extinguished due to the plaintiff's repayment, not the plaintiff's claim for the exclusion of the overall executory power of the above titles, but the plaintiff's claim for the denial of specific executory power of the title of debt, and the lawsuit for objection against the original claim is a lawsuit seeking the exclusion of the general executory power of the title of the debt itself, and cannot be instituted on the ground that the plaintiff's claim for the exclusion of individual executory power of the title of the debt and the claim for the exclusion of individual executory power of the title of the debt cannot be raised on the ground that the court below's dismissal of the plaintiff's principal lawsuit is legitimate, and it is not a decision of appeal against the plaintiff's claim for objection.

Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

[Judgment of the Supreme Court (Presiding Judge) Nabri-dong and Dobri-Jaking Hanwon

심급 사건
-서울민사지방법원 1971.4.6.선고 70나492
본문참조조문
기타문서