However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 18:00, the Busan Seo-gu Btel 713, the Defendant: (b) assisted the said C to engage in an act of arranging sexual traffic by providing five officetelss from July 2014 to October 18:0, 2014, on condition that C, who is a woman of sexual traffic, receives 40,000 won out of 130,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from customers, under the pretext of sexual traffic; (c) the name of the said C is unknown, and (d) the instant C, etc., to arrange sexual intercourses with many unspecified men.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol concerning D;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Control photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (the results of theC interview and evidentiary materials attached to the actual operator);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6 months to 1 year and 4 months) of the types of sexual traffic (mediation, etc. of sexual traffic through receipt, etc. of business prices) [decision of sentence] [Determination of sentence] The defendant shows the attitude of acknowledging and opposing the defendant's crime; there is no criminal history exceeding the same kind and fine; and consideration of the scale, period, profits, etc. of the business;