beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.02.09 2014고단1807

사기

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months, imprisonment with prison labor of Defendant C, imprisonment with prison labor of Defendant B, one year and six months, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year of imprisonment for the crime of forging private documents at the Daegu District Court on November 27, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 5, 2014. Defendant B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul East District Court on April 5, 2013 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 13, 2013 at the Seoul East District Court on June 18, 2013. Defendant D was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the crime of forging private documents, etc. at the Daegu District Court on November 27, 2014, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the same prison on May 26, 2015.

1. Defendant A was a person engaged in a sales agency business. In the event that sales contracts are concluded by entering into by entering into a sales contract by entering into a sales contract by entering into a sales contract by entering into a sales contract by entering into a sales contract by entering into a sales contract by entering into a sales contract with N, a part of the sales price (not less than 12% per annum) is collected as a commission.

A. The Defendant: (a) received a request from D, the representative director of NN, for the sale of forest land located in P in Nam-si P (hereinafter “the instant forest”); (b) on October 18, 2010, the Defendant entered into a real estate sales contract for KRW 19,200,000 of the purchase price with respect to approximately KRW 1,210 square meters of the victim’sO and the said forest land in Q in Nam-si, Nam-si; and (c) on October 18, 2010, the said office located in Q.

However, at the time of the conclusion of the above contract, the forest that the Defendant viewed as the Plaintiff’s land on the Do angle map, approximately KRW 1,210 square meters, was located on the roadside as the forest located on the above S, while the land on the above Do angle angle was located on the ridge line without access, and was different from the land subject to the sales contract.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 1,00,000 on the same day as the purchase price and the registration cost from the injured party, and transferred KRW 19,920,000 in total to the account under the name of U. law office designated by the Defendant, respectively.

B. The victim V.