2. Although the judgment of the court below has a favorable condition to the defendant, such as recognizing the defendant's mistake and reflecting it, the crime of this case is a crime that has been committed by the defendant as a member of the criminal organization so that the victim can withdraw a large amount of cash by phoneing to many unspecified people in Korea and keeping the victim in the house, and then intrudes into the house and steals cash outside the house and has a large amount of social harm. In this case, the crime of this case is a crime of " Boscing", which is a sort of crime that steals cash, and its social and economic harm is very serious, but it is not easy to arrest the criminal. Thus, the necessity to prevent the recurrence is very important because the defendant seriously punished the act of taking part in the theft of stored money, and it is difficult for the defendant to have made any effort to recover damage, and it is not recognized that the defendant took part in the illegal money exchange act of this case, and it is not recognized that the defendant's age, sex, sex, motive, form and scale of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime of this case.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.