beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.10.02 2013구단16435

요양불승인처분취소

Text

1. On November 23, 2012, the Defendant’s disposition of no medical care approval for the Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s injury is revoked.

Reasons

1. From February 21, 2012, the Plaintiff served at the Recycling Complex of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City BB Corporation from February 21, 2012

On August 23, 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed with the Manchological disorder and vertebial verteula accompanied by nephism, and filed an application for medical care benefits and temporary disability compensation benefits with the Defendant on October 12, 2012.

On November 23, 2012, the defendant decided not to grant medical care benefits on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the above branches and the duties of the plaintiff.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”) . [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 5-9 (including provisional number), the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. Since each of the above injury and disease alleged by the Plaintiff was caused by his duties, the instant disposition should be revoked in an unlawful manner.

B. Determination 1) In light of the overall purport of arguments in the medical record appraisal results of the above part Gap 6, 10, 11 (including family numbers), Eul's testimony, and Korea University Ansan Hospital's testimony, the plaintiff performed the duties listed in the attached Table "Disaster Investigation Details", and it can be acknowledged that the plaintiff's above duties are likely to cause a sychological disorder, and that the plaintiff's sychological disorder is hard to be seen as a sychological disorder. Accordingly, it is reasonable to view that the plaintiff's sychological disorder in the disposition of this case was caused by the plaintiff's above duties. Accordingly, it is unlawful to view that the part of the sychological gun's disability in the disposition of this case was unlawful. The plaintiff's assertion on this part is with merit. The plaintiff's 1, 4, 7, 10, 111 (including family number Nos. 11, 11 (including family number No. 2), the plaintiff's testimony on this part accompanied by the plaintiff's culiculumum.

(2) the State, a local government or local government;