However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 18, 2016, the Defendant reported 112 that “a person who does not pay a taxi fee” while failing to pay a taxi fee in front of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City B, on December 18, 2016, and was solicited by the police officer above to pay a taxi fee and return home from the security guards belonging to the Seoul Western District Police Station C police box, Seoul Western District Police Station C, who was dispatched to the scene, for the Defendant to do so.

“Abunding the police officer’s rank, intending to see the police officer’s rank on the floor by cutting it over the floor and drinking it, and assaulting him.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes attaching photographs and work logs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (including serious reflectivity, criminal records, etc.);