The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court’s determination that the instant facts charged were guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable.

Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of law by misunderstanding facts beyond the bounds of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending relevant legal principles.

And it is not necessary for the court to adopt the application for evidence at the discretion of the court.

The court below rejected the defendant's application for witness since it may not be examined when deciding the person (see Supreme Court Decision 2010Do7947, Jan. 27, 201, etc.).

Even if it is illegal, it cannot be said that it is illegal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.