2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

A. According to the Land Survey Book drawn up during the Japanese Occupation Period, the said F had no separate names from the residents of Gyeonggicheon-gun E who had a domicile in Gyeonggicheon-gun E on October 10, 1913 (F, 2 years in 1913). The said F, among the residents of Gyeonggicheon-gun E, did not exist separately.

B. Although the administrative district, land category, area, and current status of land at the time when the F was assessed, etc. were almost maintained until now, at the time when the land register was restored on August 10, 2015, the owner was still in a state of not being reinstated until now.

C. Meanwhile, on June 19, 1948, the Plaintiff’s prior domicile in Gyeonggi-gun G was killed on the part of June 19, 1948, and the J independently succeeded to H’s son and son’s son and son’s son and son’s son’s son and son’s son’s son and son’s son and son’s son’s son’s son and son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s her son’s son’s son’s son.

After that, on December 21, 2017, the Plaintiff, a co-inheritors, and M, P, Q, R, T, U, V, W, X, and Y, who were co-inheritors, completed the agreement on division of inherited property (hereinafter “instant agreement on division”) with the purport of the Plaintiff’s sole inheritance of the instant land as part of H’s descendants.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap 1 through 7 evidence (including a paper number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the Z of this court.