2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On April 23, 2014, the Plaintiff was given 30 points with the median line, and 30 points with the median line on October 22, 2014.

On December 23, 2014, the Plaintiff was under the influence of alcohol while driving under the influence of alcohol 0.071% and was given a mark of 100 points from the Defendant.

Accordingly, on February 11, 2015, the Defendant issued the instant disposition revoking the Plaintiff’s driver’s license as of March 11, 2015 pursuant to Article 93(2) of the Road Traffic Act and Article 91(1) [Attachment 28] 1(c) of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act on the ground that the Plaintiff’s total sum total sum of 160 points for one year (30 points and 100 points) of the Plaintiff’s total sum.

【In light of the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 6, and Eul evidence Nos. 8 through 11 (including virtual numbers), and the purport of the entire argument as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case, the plaintiff's assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case was the length of the plaintiff's substitute driver at the time of driving under the influence of alcohol. The disposition of this case is unlawful since the plaintiff's act of driving under the circumstances where the substitute driver had a dispute with the passenger while driving under the influence of influence of alcohol, and the volume of traffic was much and difficult to teach, and it was controlled by the plaintiff while driving a vehicle inevitably. The plaintiff is running a food material distributor at the present. Since the workplace is scattered in Kimcheon-si and Gwangju Metropolitan City, the driver's license is necessarily required for the management of the workplace, the plaintiff's blood alcohol concentration of the plaintiff's blood alcohol level was not high, and the plaintiff's act of abusing discretion by excessively harshing the plaintiff.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

Judgment

The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the above evidence, are ① The Plaintiff’s penalty accumulated points shall be revoked suspension of driver’s license prescribed in Article 91(1) [Attachment 28] of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act.