However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 14, 2017, around 22:10, the Defendant assaulted the victim C, who was in a de facto marital relationship, in the street near Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with the victim C, who was in a de facto marital relationship, was her only gird, hered, hered, and hered, and hered, hered the victim by her hand over the smuggling floor, her hand, and her hand.

2. On July 14, 2017, around 22:10, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties and the Defendant injured the victim, who was on the street near Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, and was dispatched to the site upon request for assistance from the said C, caused assault against the said C. However, the police officer belonging to the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Police Station, which served as a police officer in charge of the said C, brought about the said D, boomed the said D, clicked the drinking, hicked the said D, and continued to inflict an injury on the victim D, such as a shoulder, hicked, hicked, and hicked the left arms, which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes, and at the same time injured the victim D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each written statement of C (victim) and E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury to D;

1. Reporting on investigation (related to notification of a decision to take ad hoc measures);

1. A list of risk of recidivism of domestic violence;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) of the relevant Act on the facts constituting an offense, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of harm);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties and the crimes of injuring an injury, and the punishment imposed on the crimes of serious injury shall be imposed);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The sentencing criteria do not present a separate processing method for the commercial concurrent crimes in the application of the sentencing criteria, but the sentencing criteria are appropriate for the commercial concurrent crimes.