However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the legal couple who has married the victim B (the female, the 53 years old) and the married couple in 2003.

1. On September 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 18:25, at the Defendant’s house located in Sinung-si Co. 1703, the Defendant returned home, while under the influence of alcohol, brought alcohol to the victim; and (b) was doing a dispute; (c) assaulted the victim’s left arms to prevent the victim from going to the point of view.

2. The Defendant shall be liable for damage to property at the time, place, and on the side of the son, to “hymalty” in the manner described in paragraph 1.

For the reason that it was said that it was “,” the victim and the co-owned market value were damaged by the unclaimed table and the chair.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a) or more of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (a favorable circumstances, such as the fact that a mistake is against the law and the fact that there is no penalty force, in addition