A. On January 7, 2011, the Defendant: (a) around 22:50, at the first floor of the D hotel E in the Gangwon-do Stick-gun C, the Defendant saw twice the Plaintiff’s left-hand eye on the ground that the Plaintiff, who was a driver of F, satise, was satisfying by microphones from F at the time of singing, and the Plaintiff, who was a driver of F, satisfy.

(hereinafter “instant accident.” Meanwhile, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the blood emitting the credit prior to the instant accident, the blood emitting the skin, the blood salke, the blood salke, the blood salkeing on the left side, the blood salkeing on the glass body, etc.

B. After the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s treatment was completed, such as an external trauma emission blood, satis, etc., but the satisfy rate was lowered due to the satisfy in the external margin.

C. As above, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 2 million won on August 28, 2011 due to the monthly support of the Chuncheon District Court (201 High Court Decision 201Da9444), and paid the National Health Insurance Corporation that borne the Plaintiff’s medical expenses with the indemnity amount of KRW 959,220 on January 25, 201 and KRW 95,230 on October 31 of the same year, respectively.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts that there is no dispute between the parties, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2 through 6 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts, the defendant suffered from injury, such as the blood emitting credit prior to the occurrence of the liability for damages, the defendant committed violence against the plaintiff, and suffered from injury, such as the blood emitting credit prior to the occurrence of the liability for damages, the blood typosis, the blood typosis, the blood typosis, the left-hand typosis, and the blood typosis, etc., and eventually, the defendant is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the plaintiff as a tort.

Accordingly, immediately after the instant accident, the Defendant did not state the credit margin, which caused the lack of eyesight, in the medical certificate for the Plaintiff, and only after two years from the instant accident, the medical certificate from March 26, 2013, the Defendant mentioned the credit margin in the medical certificate and treated the Plaintiff.