However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 7, 2016, from around 20:00 to 20:30, the Defendant: (a) was on the street in front of the D cafeteria located in Seosan-si; (b) was on board the F cab chief operated by the victim E; and (c) the victim asked the Defendant for the destination to the destination of the Defendant, and (d) was on the part of the Defendant, who was an engineer, “Isty frie., not on the part of the Defendant.”

“A bath,” such as “,” was made.

The Defendant reported the Defendant 112 and sent to the scene by the police, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s taxi business by force and deceptive means to prevent the said E from driving a taxi over about 30 minutes, such as allowing the police officer to drive alcohol and drive alcohol for the victim.

2. On September 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 by G District Police Officers H and I on the same ground as that of paragraph (1) around 20:30 on September 7, 2016; and (b) took measures to return home by G District Police Officers H and I on the same day; (c) around 21:10 on the 21:10 day, the Defendant sent the police officer on duty at the 1st floor of the Seosan Police Station located in the 159th century.

I would like to complete it here.

“Absent with desire to do so, and the police officer H, and I reconvened to the aforesaid Seosan Police Station, and the police officer H and I expressed the desire to “H and I, as the police officer considered, to have been in mind at the time of the above police officer’s first time.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. E statements;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear statements by police officers sent to the scene by telephone);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1) and 313 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with the performance of official duties) and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, and Article 38.