When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 4, 2016, the Defendant: “D” located in Seocheon-si C around 20:35 on August 4, 2016, sent to the Defendant, for the purpose of leading to committing a crime, and to the Victim F, who is the police officer belonging to the E District Police Station, for the living safety of the Seocheon-si Police Station, and for the victim F, the E District Police Officer.

"I am, I am, I am bad, I am, I am, I am.

C."C.", "J. E.S. E. H. E. H. and E.N. Ha.

n either directly or equally.

해. 내 아들뻘 되는 놈들이." 라며 게임을 이용하는 손님들 10 여 명이 함께 있는 가운데서 욕설하여 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (the defense counsel of the defendant)

However, according to the police statement protocol on F, the above evidence, in particular, recognizes the fact that the defendant used the expression "Chosia" to destroy the character of the victim, and therefore, it should be recognized that the defendant had the intent to insult the victim by referring the victim to the desire of the victim.

Therefore, the above argument is without merit.