On November 2013, the Defendant purchased from the present (State) clan to pack the land near the E in Gyeonggi-do from H clan to the victim G at the F sale office located in the Dong-si, Gyeonggi-do around November 2013, and composed of a single house of ten debt size.

Since it has already been made up three existing high-class houses as security, it is possible to borrow 1.155 million won from the Saemaul Treasury in the name of four names, and it is possible to have eight existing 10,500,000 won out of the 10-class detached houses take over the loan obligation to the seller.

Until springing 2014, the term “ponners will be deducted from the borrower” was false.

However, the facts are as follows: (a) D) the Defendant was operating by the clan H to carry out the construction work by acquiring ownership from the land near the Eth of Gyeonggi-do, for this reason, and for this reason, H clans had already been completed with respect to the land in the construction work including three loans, and filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the resolution of the general meeting of clans on October 31, 2012 on the ground that ownership has been transferred to the competent court without the resolution of the general meeting of clans in force on November 8, 2013, and it was sentenced that the resolution of the general meeting of clans on the transfer of ownership of the land was null and void; (b) there was no fact that it was sold to eight separate houses including three loans completed by the Corporation; and (c) there was a dispute over the construction work of 3 loans completed by the Corporation, i.e., I and the previous corporation, and even if the victim obtained a loan from the Saemaeul without labor for a loan of up to 1.15 billion won to the victim's ability to use the loan.