beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.05.03 2017노604

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The gist of the defendant's appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, observation of protection, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable. However, in full view of the various circumstances that are the conditions of sentencing as shown in this case, the above argument is without merit since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable since it is not acknowledged that the sentence imposed by the defendant is too unreasonable (Provided, That the court below erred by putting a "narcotics appraisal report" without undergoing an examination of evidence as evidence proving criminal facts against the defendant, but the remaining evidence except this is sufficiently recognized, and the above error of the court below is not affected by the judgment). Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.