2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be postponed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is engaged in driving a Belgium car.

On August 2, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.192% of blood alcohol concentration on August 23, 2015, proceeded from the port of 000 to the southCC distance on the side of 0.05.

At this point, there was a traffic signal, etc., and the signal, etc. was a red signal in the direction of the defendant's proceeding, so in such a case, the person engaged in driving service had a duty of care to live well in the front, and to drive in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to perform the above duty of care and went into the port from the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle by negligence and thereby neglecting the signal, took the victim’s vehicle fronter of the vehicle driven by the Defendant into the right side of the vehicle of the Defendant’s driving, and due to the shock, the Defendant’s vehicle was driven into the right side of the vehicle of the Defendant’s passenger vehicle of the victim FM520 (the age of 48) while the Defendant’s vehicle was in front of the signal at the opposite lane.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim D, such as knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne knee kne knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee, the victim I (10 years old) who was on the said car, suffered injury to the victim F, which requires approximately two-day medical treatment, and at the same time, suffered injury to the victim D's kne kne kne kne ke ke kle kle kle k, etc., at the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;