보증채무금
1. The Defendants jointly and severally pay KRW 303,722,891 to the Plaintiff.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.
3...
1. Facts of recognition;
A. C Co., Ltd. entered into a credit transaction agreement with Han Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “one Bank”) on June 25, 2009 and received a loan.
The Defendants, as joint and several sureties 1, concluded a comprehensive collateral guarantee contract consisting of 1,635,400,000 each limit of collateral guarantee with respect to the credit transaction agreement, and concluded a comprehensive collateral guarantee contract consisting of 260,000,000 each limit of collateral guarantee with respect to the credit transaction agreement Nos. 2.
(F) In addition to each of the above credit transactions agreements, 19% per annum of the interest rate of 1,258,000,000 in general loan interest rate of 1,258,00,000 in general loan interest rate of 19% per annum 200,000,000 in general loan interest rate of 19% per annum.
B. C Co., Ltd. lost the benefit of time under each of the instant credit transaction agreements. The loan balance under each of the instant credit transaction agreements is KRW 288,609,766, 15,113,125, total of KRW 303,72,891, and KRW 288,66, 288,66, 200, 200, 2000,000,000 won.
C. On October 28, 2010, Hana Bank entered into an asset acquisition agreement with Komato Savings Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Inmato Savings Bank”), and on November 29, 201 of the same year, transferred all of the loan bonds under each of the instant credit transaction agreements to the Komato Savings Bank and transferred the bonds lawfully.
On September 18, 2011, the Komato Savings Bank is subject to the Financial Services Commission's order for decision on and management improvement of insolvent financial institutions, but fails to comply with the above order for management improvement.
Accordingly, the Financial Services Commission made a decision to transfer a contract to a new savings bank (hereinafter “former new savings bank”) on January 2, 2012 pursuant to Article 14(2) of the Act on the Structural Improvement of the Financial Industry, and publicly announced the decision, the claims under each credit transaction agreement of this case are all old savings banks.