보증금반환
1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
2. Of the appeal costs, the part arising between the Plaintiff and the Defendant B is Defendant B.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case as described in paragraph (2) below. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Parts to be dried;
A. On the 5th page of the judgment of the first instance, the 5th page “Defendant” shall be applied to Defendant C.
B. On the 5th page of the first instance judgment, the “each testimony of I” was written by having “I’s partial testimony” as “each testimony of I”.
C. Part 14 of the first instance judgment No. 9 of the first instance judgment "," and part 10 of the first instance judgment No. 14 through No. 14 of the 10 of the 14 were written by putting ", therefore, since they were in a state," respectively.
Part 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the first to the second to the second to the 16th to the 12th to the 16th to the "no grounds" shall be followed as follows:
According to the evidence No. 5 (Real Estate Lease Contract), although the plaintiff and defendant C entered into a lease agreement on the second shop of this case with the approval of the defendant C, they are deemed to have agreed to restore the second shop of this case to its original state at the plaintiff's expense before the return of the second shop of this case, but there is no specific assertion or proof by the defendant C regarding the part and expenses that the plaintiff should restore to its original state. Thus, this part of the defendant C's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendants' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.