In light of relevant legal principles and evidence, the lower court’s judgment that convicted all of the facts charged of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning did not exhaust all necessary deliberations as alleged in the grounds of appeal and did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the time and scope of establishment of the crime of accepting a bribe, the calculation of additionally collected amount based thereon, and the recognition of a public offering relationship, where a crime of accepting a bribe is established, inasmuch as it can be assessed as having been directly received by a public official by a person other than a public official, in violation of the rules of evidence or duties related

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.