However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

"2018 Highest 1766"

1. On May 1, 2018, at around 23:10, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as: (a) under the influence of alcohol, the victim was reported by the injured person two years prior to finding the victim and having customers, while drinking, and (b) the victim was able to talk about 20 minutes of sound; and (c) the victim was able to talk with the customer with a strong desire for drinking; and (d) the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim, at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, at the victim D(59)’s blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick

The defendant of the 2018 Highest 1790, the defendant of the 2018 Highest 1790, on May 5, 2018, at the "E cafeteria" operated by the victim D in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul around 21:15, the same year.

5. 1. The above restaurant’s arrest of the flagrant offender as the act of avoiding disturbance in the above restaurant was frightened, and the victim expressed that “Neas reported and punished,” and that “Neas if reported, knife, knife, knife, and chrone,” was threatened, and caused a disturbance over about 25 minutes, such as large interest, and making customers go at the restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 1766"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Investigation report (related to the statement of a wooden person);

1. A criminal investigation report (related to the verification of evidence images) 2018 Highest 1790;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Written statements of D;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the Table for Reporting Processing;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business) concerning the facts constituting an offense under the relevant Article of the Act;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution (the defendant reflects his fault; and