On May 2012, the Defendant, at the office of the third floor of the Busan East-gu Office, Busan, had CD and CE file an application for provisional seizure with the intent to be subject to criminal punishment, stating “H” in the column of the borrowing instrument, “CF and B,” and then, as “CF and B,” the Defendant written the description “B” in the column of the debtor: (a) entered the “CF” in the column of the borrowing instrument; (b) affixed the H seal imprint on the same date; (c) made the aforementioned application for provisional seizure with the signature of 100,000 won on the same date; and (d) made the above application for provisional seizure with the signature of 201,00 won on the signature and seal of the KF and CG; and (b) made the above provisional seizure with the signature and seal of 10,010,000 won on the signature and seal of the KF and 12,010,000 won on the signature and seal of the KG; and (cF) made the above application with the signature of 12,101.

However, the borrowed money certificate was prepared by A with the consent of the defendant, the defendant, and there was no fact that the CD and CE forged the borrowed money certificate.

On May 29, 2012, the Defendant received a written complaint from the public service center of the 6th Busan Jin-ro 111-ro, Busan-gu, Busan-gu, Busan-gu, and rejected CDs and CE.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of a witness AO, A, and CD;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution;