However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 5, 2018, at least 22:00, the Defendant took a 112 report in front of a restaurant located in Daegu B, and took a bath to the following: (a) he was urged to return home from the head E of the police box belonging to the Taesgu Police Station, who was called to the scene after having received a 112 report on the content of “Newhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A 112 reported case handling box, and a service log for a police box;

1. Visual images closures;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (cafeteria business operator telephone statement listening);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. In full view of all the circumstances, such as the nature of the crime is bad, the defendant's perception of his mistake and the fact that the defendant does not repeat the crime, the primary crime, the degree of damage, the circumstances of the crime, the degree of the crime, the degree of the crime, and the prosecution's punishment, etc., the crime obstructing the legitimate execution of official duties for the reason of sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act is sentenced as ordered.