A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of three and a half years, and imprisonment with prison labor for a period of one and a half years.

An applicant for compensation.

[Criminal Power: Defendant A was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on July 20, 2007. On May 2, 2008, the court was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment and four months of imprisonment for fraud and completed the execution of each of the above punishment on August 13, 2010. On August 8, 2014, the Seoul Central District Court was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud and became final and conclusive on February 9, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

Not more than hereinafter, each combination case shall be entered, and it has been cultivated in order of time, not in the order of case number.

[2014 Highest 9502: Defendants B’s fraud is the name of “F”, which is the food materials distributor, and the Defendants, as co-operator of the above “F”, conspired to acquire the goods from the supplier without intent or ability to pay the goods normally.

Defendant

A around February 3, 2012, according to the above public offering, the Plaintiff called “F” office located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon at the “F office” office located in 105, the victim H, called “K, who is an employee of the J Wholesale and Distribution Center for the I.S. Co., Ltd., Ltd., and said public offering, to the effect that “I will settle the payment on the last date of delivery if I.S.

However, in fact, Defendant A operated Lart in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government in 201 and had approximately KRW 170 million debt for goods supplied on credit, and Defendant B did not have certain profits or property, and Defendant B did not have any profits or property, and Defendant B did not intend to pay the amount of the fixed amount to the victim, other than the method of paying the amount of the fixed amount of the money received from the victim by disposing of the fixed amount of money supplied by the victim, but did not pay the amount of the money received by the victim to the victim for personal purposes, such as the payment of the existing amount of debt, and thus, Defendant A was thought to have used the money received by the victim for personal purposes, such as the payment of the amount of the fixed amount of money received by the victim. Therefore, Defendant B was provided with the fixed amount of