When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 5, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B that “The Defendant would have repaid 6 million won after one month,” at the mutual infinite coffee shop in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul.

However, the Defendant did not have any income due to the absence of a certain occupation, and there was no economic circumstance as much as he could not pay the rent for the residence. Therefore, even if he borrowed money, he did not have the intent and ability to repay it within the fixed time limit.

As above, the Defendant deceptioned the victim, and obtained 6 million won from the victim, namely, i.e., e., 6 million won from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;