beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.09.06 2017고단30

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 22, 2015, the Defendant presented the name of “D” D, “F U.S. Branch” to the victim E in the Kafbook located in Yasi-si, Yasan-si, the Defendant, as if the Defendant was the director of the U.S. U.S. branch office in the name of “F,” and entered into a remodeling construction contract with the victim and the construction cost of KRW 25 million for G apartment 103 dong 2006 in the name of “F,” while entering into a remodeling construction contract with the victim for KRW 25 million in the name of “F,” the Defendant would be able to use the victim to carry out construction works together with the F employees, and would also

On July 2015, 2015, “A person who starts construction works and completes construction works until the end of July 2015” was false.

However, in order to obtain the victim’s trust, the Defendant used the name of “F” as if it were conducted by a specialized engineer, and did not work at a specialized engineer with the trade name of “F.” The Defendant thought that it would be used as a priority for the construction cost incurred at another construction site, such as the construction site in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, etc., and thus, did not have any intent or ability to complete apartment remodeling construction work on the date as agreed, even if the Defendant received the payment from the injured party for the construction cost.

The Defendant received KRW 7,50,000 from the Defendant’s agricultural bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day as the down payment, and received KRW 10 million from the same account on July 30, 2015 as the intermediate payment, and received KRW 10,000,000 from the same account on August 17, 2015 as the remainder payment.

2. On April 26, 2015, the Defendant presented the name of the “F Ulsan Branch” to the victim H at the G coffee shop in the G Gasan-si around the following day. The Defendant entered into a remodeling contract with the victim and the construction cost of KRW 35 million for the above G apartment 110 Dong 302 in F’s name, and entered into a remodeling contract with the victim in the name of F for the said G apartment 110 Dong 302.