도로법위반
The defendant shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment against the defendant not guilty.
1. The part of the defendant in the separate criminal facts in the indictment of this case (retailing the suspect as the defendant) is the same as the defendant.
2. As to the above facts charged, a public prosecutor was prosecuted by applying Article 86 and Article 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005; hereinafter "the former Road Act") or Article 86 and Article 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005; hereinafter "the former Road Act") and Article 86 and Article 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act (wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008) but the Constitutional Court imposed a fine on the pertinent juristic person's agent's violation of Article 208 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 10 15, Oct. 28, 2010).
Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, it is judged not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment is publicly announced under Article 440