beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.01.08 2012고단3423

방문판매등에관한법률위반

Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Defendant A is the representative director (12% shares) of H Co., Ltd. 6 of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Building 1 (hereinafter “H”) and Defendant B is the chief executive officer who exercises overall control over the steering committee composed of the head of the headquarters and 35 regional headquarters, the highest sales cause of H as a director of H (16%) and the head of the headquarters, and Defendant C is the representative director of H (12% shares holding). Defendant D is the representative director of H.O.S. and auditor (16% shares holding). Defendant E is the head of Busan headquarters as the director of H’s O andS interest director (16% shares holding), Defendant F is the head of Seo-gu headquarters as the head of the headquarters, and Defendant G is the director of the regional headquarters and the head of the regional headquarters of Yeongdeungpo-gu as the head of the regional headquarters of 35% shares holding, and Defendant C is the head of the regional headquarters and the head of the regional headquarters of Yeongdeungpo-gu for 207.7.

Defendant

A, B, C, D, E, F, and G co-principals managed 35 regional headquarters and centers across the country through H's new cooperative operation manuals, and sold en banc products, etc. by multi-level marketing method, the Defendants recommended that they be admitted to all or part of their consumers as assistant multi-level salesmen, and the assistant multi-level salesmen would be able to gain certain profits if they engage in the same activity as those of their specific persons, thereby soliciting them to acquire profits through the multi-level marketing system in which the subscription of the salesperson was made in consecutive and phased order and establishing the following class system and support allowances payment system.

When the Defendants purchase one set of “U (Class 4)” supplied by H after receiving education conducted at H [main/Center education or TT education], and purchase in KRW 396,00,00, the Defendants are entitled to registration of the consultant, and the consultant is recruited by raising the performance of the purchase of goods of KRW 24 million.