However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates a mobile phone sales store with the trade name of “C” in Sungnam-si, Manam-si.

1. At around 18:00 on May 8, 2014, the Defendant, through H, knowingly acquired 270,000 won for the instant gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-gal-

2. On the 13th day of the same month, at the same place, the Defendant purchased 20,000 won through H with knowledge of the fact that it was stolen by I, and acquired stolen property at the same place.

3. The Defendant, at the same place on the 16th day of the same month, purchased 50,000 won of the market value of the ELG2 mobile phone owned by D, with knowledge of the fact that it was stolen, and acquired stolen goods through H.

4. Around the 17th day of the same month, the Defendant purchased stolen goods at H via H, even though he was aware that the amount equivalent to KRW 900,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of each protocol of suspect examination of H by the police;

1. Inquiry about liquidity details, application of each text and photographic statute;

1. Relevant Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution (the four victims have agreed with each other).