Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

The defendant is a second U.S. Korean employee who acquired the citizenship of the United States and actually operates as a representative of E who is an overseas immigration intermediary that deals with affairs such as preparation of an employment contract, application for labor permit, application for immigration permit, etc. on behalf of the persons who wish to immigration by means of employment with an enterprise located in the United States, and F (Korean Name) is an employee of E, who is in charge of practical affairs such as sending documents prepared and forged employment contracts to the victim H.

On November 2006, the Defendant: “I was the representative of E, a company with employment immigration assistance, who is an agent of E, the representative of E, a company with substantial knowledge of the representative of E, a company in the United States of America, and made a transaction with the E, a company with significant immigration assistance in Korea. Thus, if I recruited a person who wishes to have employment assistance in the United States in Korea, I would live in the United States of America and prepare an employment contract by securing the U.S. employer for the above assistant, and would cause the transfer of the fees necessary for the employment assistance.” On December 3, 2006, I would like to say that I would like to have the above ability of the Defendant, and I would like to prepare the above work agreement through mail on December 3, 2006.

However, the defendant does not have any capacity to act on behalf of the U.S. employment immigration or employment visa holders, and the E company is not an officially registered company, and even if the aforementioned company's name does not have any capacity to act on behalf of the U.S. employees, even if the fees required to act on behalf of the victims for employment immigration have not been transferred due to the lack of employment immigration or employment visa in the U.S., the defendant did not have any intent or ability to

In collusion with the above F, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is subject to such deception on January 10, 207 from the victim.