beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.19 2013고단6981

사기

Text

The Defendants publicly announced the purport of the judgment of innocence.

Reasons

1. Defendant A, in the facts charged, is the previous physician of the “H church” in Suwon-si G, Defendant B’s husband and wife of the said church, and Defendant C’s husband and wife of the said church due to the omission of Defendant A.

The Defendants conspired to acquire a large amount of money from the victim by making a false statement that the her husband can live if the her husband dies, and if the her husband pays the money to the church.

On April 22, 2012, the Defendants made it difficult to know the trade name in Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, the church training conference is set between the parties, and Defendant A presented to the victim that “Irre J to the her husband. Irre that Irre am on the whole of the J house when Ir am dead, but Irre am dn't son. Irre am to the effect that Irre am. Irre am. Ir am? Ir am. Ir am.? Ir am.? Irre am.???? on April 23, 2012 after the following day, I asked how I can live her husband if Ir am. Ir am. Ir am. Ir am. Ir am. Ir am. Ir am. Ir am. Ir am. Ir am. Ir am. Ir am.'s life.”

4. From around 23. 23.

4. By four times a day until 27.2, each time four times a day, stating, “Nr. Nr. I believe that N. will create and respond to N.S....................................], ordering individuals and believers, including the victims attending the course of worship, solely to believe that the above remarks are made strongly, and the following seals are affixed:

4. 24. In the case of Defendant B, the Defendant B came to know of the Victim’s death on the part of Defendant A, and was able to look at the Justice because of whom, in which case, he was able to get the Victim’s death on the part of Defendant A. The money is not to be considered due to Defendant A.