However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 4, 2011, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon branch of the Daegu District Court on October 4, 201, and the summary order of KRW 1,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court on February 20, 2014.

On May 12, 2015, the Defendant driven a Bice car with a blood alcohol content of at least 0.10% from a section of about 500 meters from May 12, 2015, when he/she was under the influence of alcohol at least two times, from the front side of the old-si Gao apartment to the old-si Gao-dong Gao-dong Gao-dong Gao-dong, the Defendant driven the Bice car with a alcohol content of at least 0.10%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the situation of running a driving under the influence of alcohol, inquiry into the results of the crackdown on driving under the influence of alcohol, and report on the state of standing;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal history records, investigation reports (reports, such as verification of the records of criminal acts of the same kind as a suspect), dispositions, previous records, results of confirmation, two copies of report, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of two copies of summary orders;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da15488, Apr. 2, 2007) (see, 2008Da1248, Apr. 2, 2007)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act to attend lectures;