The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment and the first instance court in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court is justifiable to have determined that all the facts charged (excluding the part on which the first instance court acquitted the Defendant) were guilty on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the law of logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, misapprehending the legal doctrine on fraud, failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, or failing to meet the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.