난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. During the process of the disposition, the following facts are: (a) there is no dispute over the grounds for rejection of the decision made on February 24, 2015 of the date of the application for refugee status recognition (B-2) on June 3, 2015; (b) the date of the application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on July 21, 2015; (c) there is no sufficient ground for rejection of the decision made on February 24, 2017 of the date of the application for objection; (d) there is no ground for rejection of the decision made on February 24, 2017; (e) Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, and 2; and (e) the purport of the entire pleadings; and (e) the purport of the entire pleadings.
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiff's assertion is a national of the Egypt Republic of Egypt (hereinafter "Egypt").
The plaintiff-friendly village was a member of the Muslim type, and the plaintiff was demanded to join the Muslim type.
As the Plaintiff refused the above demand, the Plaintiff’s friendship threatened the Plaintiff.
The plaintiff has been in the Republic of Korea regardless of the harm Egypt as above.
As such, the Plaintiff’s return to Egypt is likely to threaten, and thus, it should be recognized as a refugee.
B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines refugee status as “any foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion, or who is a stateless foreigner who is unable or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” 2) The Plaintiff asserted that he/she was threatened by this Court on the grounds that he/she is not a member of the Non-Sllimt Zone, for the reason that he/she is not a member of the Non-Sl
However, the plaintiff stated in the application for refugee status that he was threatened by the overfinite violenceist, but at the time of the regular refugee interview.