2. The defendants led to the confession of the crime of this case, the defendant A deposited KRW 1.5 million each for the recovery of damage to AK and AO, and the defendant B deposited KRW 1.5 million each for the recovery of damage to the victim AI and AH, and the defendant B did not have any record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime. However, due to the characteristics of the crime of this case, which constitutes the " Boscing" crime, it causes serious harm not only to the victims, but also to our society, and it is difficult to recover from damage in a planned and organized manner. The crime of this case was committed against many unspecified victims. The crime of this case was committed during the period of suspension of execution, in light of the circumstances, frequency, etc. of the crime of this case, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant A, and the crime of this case was committed during the period of suspension of execution, and the defendants' age, sex, environment, motive, means, result, etc. of the crime of this case, and there are no grounds for sentencing of the defendants.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals by the Defendants are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.