However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

【Criminal Power】 On April 5, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as an obstruction of performance of official duties by the Seoul Eastern District Court.

【범죄사실】 피고인은 2014. 3. 23. 02:10경 서울 송파구 B에 있는 서울송파경찰서 C지구대에서 술에 취해 소란을 피우던 중, 그곳에서 상황근무 중이던 서울송파경찰서 C지구대 소속 경찰관인 경감 D으로부터 술에 취했으니 그만 귀가하라는 말을 듣자, “씨발놈들 니들이 경찰관이냐, 개새끼, 병신 새끼야, 여기가 구치소 아니잖아, 우리 아버지가 누군지 아냐 아버지 오면 다 죽는다. 씨발놈아, 개새끼”라고 욕설을 하면서 그곳에 있던 신문지를 말아 위 D에게 집어 던진 다음 손에 쥔 휴대폰으로 그를 때릴 듯이 위협하고, 옆에서 이를 제지하던 위 지구대 소속 경찰관인 순경 E의 얼굴에 침을 뱉어 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the duty of global guard.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E and D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order is that the defendant has been punished by a fine for the same kind of crime, and that the defendant has not recovered from damage is disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, it is difficult to view that the defendant recognized the crime and divided, that the degree of violence and intimidation is very serious, and that the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the fine is favorable to the defendant.

In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as character, environment, family relationship, occupation, etc., are considered as the order.