2. Although the Defendant is led to confession and reflect, and the health of the Defendant is not good, the Defendant again committed each of the instant crimes even if he was punished more than four times due to the commission of the instant crime involving phiphones, and in full view of the following circumstances, comprehensively taking into account the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.