2. This does not mean that there are favorable circumstances, such as the circumstance in which the defendant reported the Internet bulletin and participated in the hosting, and the fact that the crime of this case is recognized and reflected.

However, not only is the risk of the instant crime, but also the Defendant is highly likely to be subject to criticism when committing the instant crime without being informed of during the period of suspension of execution.

In full view of the equity between the punishment history and involvement of the accomplices who participated in the licensing of this case, the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable, as it seems that the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.